PID, AIGo, SuperAIGo
By 2050, if even half of the technological breakthroughs happen in Brain Computer Interface that are being explored today, what might a highly integrated human-BCI-AIBot look like? And how will people describe the intersections between human consciousness-knowledge-ideas and the same ideas at or across a Fuzzy Edge?
Whether it's from the more invasive neural-lace , or the less invasive fNIRS (functional near infrared spectroscopy) - it seems quite likely within a few decades we're going to continue to get more integrated.
This interconnection got me thinking - how might we describe the interface & hierarchy of AI that mirrors the human one, in a language that will resonate? What ego-stack might make a Cognitive Wingman tick? And most importantly - can we make it sound sort of cool and catchy?
ID EGO SUPEREGO
"According to this Freudian model of the psyche, the id is the set of uncoordinated instinctual trends; the super-ego plays the critical and moralizing role; and the ego is the organized, realistic part that mediates between the desires of the id and the super-ego."
As with humans - the stack of AI has a hierarchy of needs - and concerns ranging from the terrestrial to the celestial....
What might this look like?
PID AIGo SuperAIGo
I originally had the lower level instinctual pieces (reptilian, base of brain) tagged as COP - Computer Operating Properly (COP Watchdogs in the old days) but PID ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_identifier ) has a better ring.
The intersections are interesting.
- Can people have shared AIGo? (ego) and are there hyper-personal my-AiGos? (MAIGos ?)
- If a person, group or AI avatar were to create a 'mind palace' and represent ideas (mental models) - where would they live? And how would they be represented to different users?
- What role might ethics, compliance and regulation play in SuperAIGo? How about access?
About this blog
Cognitive Wingman - Never Walk Alone
Created: December 20, 2016English